Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dana • Dostoevsky Bookclub's avatar

Thank you for such an engaging article and for selecting concise excerpts for discussion! It's a lifesaver—I even read more at the beginning. You've written brilliantly about the main character, portraying him as an oxymoron.

I noticed that they begin by reading the Sorrowful Mysteries, which includes Jesus' prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane before his execution. This parallels the dead soldier who died alone in another garden. While we can't equate the soldier's death with an execution, the disregard for his body and how the memory of his tortured form haunts Fabrizio seems to continue the Sorrowful Mysteries motif. Fabrizio's quest to understand "Why did that soldier die?" echoes the question of Jesus' death, albeit on a smaller scale. Was it mere chance that he sought refuge in Fabrizio's palace?

Intriguingly, they pray in a chapel within their palace that features both Christian motifs and the ancient Roman pantheon. After the Rosary, the gods on the frescoes "awaken," as if they had respectfully withdrawn during prayers to another faith. If other deities occupy 23 and a half hours, which ones truly represent the House of Salina? Given Fabrizio's fascination with astronomy, the Olympian pantheon might resonate more—at least Mars and Venus are visible in the night sky.

The garden description is exquisite prose. The notion that everything there aspired to beauty but succumbed to laziness, and that it could only please the blind, paints a powerful image. If it's filled with magical aromas, count me in! Scents are paramount, and their link to memories is unbreakable. It's reminiscent of Proust, who in his books constantly smells his surroundings to evoke memories.

As for the little dog, I'm thrilled if he's the main character and the bearer of the central idea. I have two thoughts: he might guide the narrative, with Fabrizio following him and triggering events along the way. Alternatively, if his name implies he's blessed, perhaps he's the only family member who truly acts naturally, according to his good nature. The others might be influenced by their coat of arms, behaving more like wild cats than Christians. There's even a mention of the dog digging in the garden with the zeal of a true Christian.

I'm glad I joined the reading; I didn't expect such beautiful language and so many images and metaphors. I'm really looking forward to continuing the discussion.

Expand full comment
Alison Macaulay's avatar

Thanks for your great introduction Ellie. I absolutely loved these opening pages. What a way to start. There's such a heaviness, and rottenness, and sensual energy to them. And the image of the painted figures peeping up the skirts of the ladies (and the *priest*) was wonderful.

I wondered about the paintings "ignoring the rules of perspective" - is the suggestion that these are not very good paintings, ie that this says something about the family being perhaps not as high and mighty (and rich) as they might appear at first?

The description of the garden is wonderful too. I'm reading Daniel Mason's North Woods at the moment, and there's a great image in that of an apple tree growing from a seed in the belly of a dead man which reminded me of these pages. I guess all gardening is like that - decay and regrowth and decay and regrowth. Or vice versa!

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts